Building Legacies that Last Estate Planning and Elder Law

Suing Yourself on Behalf of an Estate

Bigstock-Young-man-holding-a-trash-bin--26453660[1]Estate executors and personal representatives have a duty to the estate to pursue any causes of action that the estate might have, but what if that means they have to sue themselves? A case in Utah answers that question.

If a deceased person or the estate of that person has reasonable legal recourse against some other person or entity, then it is ordinarily the duty of the estate's representative to pursue that action in court. However, a recent case in Utah shows how that can lead to interesting results.

A man died in a one-vehicle accident when his common law wife was driving. The wife was the man's sole heir and was named the personal representative of his estate. In that capacity, on behalf of the estate, she filed a lawsuit against herself for wrongful death. Then, in her capacity as an individual and the defendant in the wrongful death case, she moved to dismiss the case on the grounds she could not sue herself.

The trial court dismissed the lawsuit.

The grounds?

Public policy prevents someone from suing themselves.

However, the Utah Supreme Court reversed that and allowed the wrongful death lawsuit to continue.

The Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog discussed this case in "Case Summary on Suing Yourself as Personal Representative for Wrongful Death."

At first glance, this might seem ridiculous and pointless, since the woman is the sole heir. Even if the estate collects money from the lawsuit, it would just go to her. However, there are a couple of things that could be going on here.

Before any heirs receive their inheritances from the estate, any debts of the deceased have to be paid. It could be that the estate cannot cover the man's debts, unless judgment is obtained against the woman.

Another possibility is that the woman had insurance at the time of the accident. In that case, the insurance company might be required to indemnify her if she is held liable for wrongful death.

Thus, the estate would not really be collecting from her. It would be collecting from the insurance company.

Reference: Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog (Dec. 22, 2016) "Case Summary on Suing Yourself as Personal Representative for Wrongful Death"

 

Tupac’s Pendant for Sale

Bigstock-Vintage-brass-telescope-on-ant-44347372[1]If you would like to purchase a pendant that Tupac Shakur was wearing when he was shot, you can. You might get sued though.

The deceased rapper Tupac Shakur remains one of the biggest stars of the music genre years after his death. Fans still cannot get enough of his music, but his personal items have not been nearly as accessible to interested collectors.

A single piece of memorabilia has now appeared.

According to TMZ in "Tupac Bullet-Dented Pendant. . . Up For Grabs For $125K," a bullet-dented pendant the rapper was wearing when he was shot in New York City two years before his death is up for sale at a fixed price of $125,000

The pendant was allegedly given to a memorabilia dealer for the sale by an unnamed family member. It is not certain why it is a sale for a fixed price when most high value celebrity memorabilia is put up for auction.

What does seem clear is that this sale is very much a buyer beware situation.

Tupac's estate has declared that no one, including family, has been authorized to sell any merchandise. The estate has threatened to sue anyone who sells or buys the pendant.

Until more details come out, it cannot be determined whether the estate has the right to block the sale of this pendant.

If the family member who gave it to the dealer was given the pendant as part of the estate, then it is not clear what grounds the estate has to sue on. However, if the pendant was improperly acquired, then the estate has a much better case.

Reference: TMZ (Oct. 16, 2016) "Tupac Bullet-Dented Pendant. . . Up For Grabs For $125K."